How Philanthropy Might Surprise Us in 2023
/Philanthropy can be a bit stodgy, but especially in recent years, the sector has kept us guessing. Here are a few ways philanthropy might surprise us in 2023 — some good, some not so good.
Read MorePhilanthropy can be a bit stodgy, but especially in recent years, the sector has kept us guessing. Here are a few ways philanthropy might surprise us in 2023 — some good, some not so good.
Read MoreAs part of a $4.5 billion legal settlement, the opioid-dealing Sackler clan will temporarily relinquish the right to place their name on buildings. It’s a novel development for a family central to the ongoing debate over toxic gifts.
Read MoreHarvard will now prohibit the solicitation of gifts from donors who have family members applying for admission. Yet the school continues to grant legacy preferences to children of alumni, a practice that critics say perpetuates inequality.
Read MoreChan Zuckerberg Initiative grantees and employees have publicly called for changes at CZI and Facebook. We explore why the social network’s actions are spilling over into the legally separate entity built on Facebook riches.
Read MoreIn recent years, critics have sounded off about how the wealthy and corporations use philanthropy to burnish their reputations. Now such concerns are intensifying—even as nonprofits need every donor they can find.
Read MoreIncreasingly cash-strapped university administrators grappling with how to handle toxic gifts may be reluctant to make a clean break from radioactive donors and their millions. The high-profile case study of Tufts University underscores the drawbacks of this strategy.
Read MoreAs the wealthy class and its philanthropy come under scrutiny, more executives at universities and other nonprofits are grappling with how to deal with gifts from disgraced donors. A recent well-handled case at OSU offers a blueprint.
Read MoreReturning a toxic gift or transferring the amount to a relevant charitable cause isn’t as common—or easy—as you’d think. Recent history shows that the reasons for not doing so range from the well-intentioned to the highly dubious.
Read MoreWe often idealize science as insulated from matters of power and corruption. Jeffrey Epstein’s ties to research institutions and scientists are a reminder that the way we fund science holds meaning and consequences.
Read MoreJeffrey Epstein not only made gifts to a wide range of Jewish organizations, he cultivated a deep relationship with one of the most important Jewish philanthropists in the U.S., billionaire Leslie Wexner—revelations that raise troubling questions.
Read MoreWithin a week, three major museums pledged to refuse future donations from the Sacklers. But as over a thousand lawsuits against the family make their way through U.S. courts, other recipients of Sackler cash have remained curiously silent.
Read MoreWith new evidence tying the Sackler family to the deadly opioid epidemic, pressure is growing on recipients of Sackler gifts to repudiate the family and return money derived from an empire of addiction. Museums, for the time being, have yet to do so. Why?
Read MoreWe sort through the biggest controversy yet over the problem of tainted donations. How should nonprofits view gifts, past and present, from a family accused of propagating the opioid crisis?
Read MoreA crazy case involving a wealthy family and a Massachusetts college raises a sticky question: When charities want to distance themselves from the tarnished reputations of donors, what are their options?
Read More